GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M390
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M390 and GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R9 M390 outperforms GT 750M Mac Edition by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 503 | 717 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.03 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | Pitcairn | GK107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 (10 years ago) | 8 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 926 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5000 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 29.63 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.7112 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 16 |
| TMUs | no data | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1254 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 80.26 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
| Mantle | + | - |
| CUDA | - | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 43
+139%
| 18−20
−139%
|
| 4K | 20
+150%
| 8−9
−150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+154%
|
35−40
−154%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+128%
|
60−65
−128%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+148%
|
27−30
−148%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 34
+143%
|
14−16
−143%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
+158%
|
12−14
−158%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+154%
|
35−40
−154%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+148%
|
27−30
−148%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+154%
|
35−40
−154%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+133%
|
30−33
−133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+161%
|
18−20
−161%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+124%
|
45−50
−124%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+150%
|
8−9
−150%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+129%
|
21−24
−129%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
This is how R9 M390 and GT 750M Mac Edition compete in popular games:
- R9 M390 is 139% faster in 1080p
- R9 M390 is 150% faster in 4K
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
