Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) vs Radeon R9 M385X

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M385X and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M385X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
4.46
+40.7%

R9 M385X outperforms Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking632725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameStratoSurface Book
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speed1000 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate61.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M385X 4.46
+40.7%
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) 3.17

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M385X 5515
+114%
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) 2577

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M385X 3405
+64%
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) 2076

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M385X 22544
+98.1%
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) 11380

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−3.7%
28
+3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Fortnite 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Valorant 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Fortnite 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Valorant 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how R9 M385X and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) compete in popular games:

  • Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is 4% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M385X is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M385X surpassed Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 3.17
Recency 5 May 2015 1 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB

R9 M385X has a 40.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Radeon R9 M385X is our recommended choice as it beats the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Radeon R9 M385X
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M385X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M385X or Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.