GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M385

Place in performance ranking	576	604
Place by popularity	not in top-100	98
Value for money	0.40	1.48
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Strato	N16S-GTR
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 June 2015 (8 years ago)	1 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$999	$899

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX130 has 270% better value for money than R9 M385.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	384
Core clock speed	no data	1122 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1242 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	56.00	29.81
Floating-point performance	1,792 gflops	953.9 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M385 and GeForce MX130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.1.126
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M385 5.32
+11.1%

GeForce MX130 4.79

Radeon R9 M385 outperforms GeForce MX130 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M385 2060
+11%

GeForce MX130 1856

Radeon R9 M385 outperforms GeForce MX130 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18−20

+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+125%

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −27.3%	14 +27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Hitman 3	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −10%	11 +10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +0%	13 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Hitman 3	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −27.3%	14 +27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −9.1%	12 +9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Hitman 3	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

This is how R9 M385 and GeForce MX130 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX130 is 0% faster than R9 M385 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M385 is 167% faster than the GeForce MX130.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 57.1% faster than the R9 M385.

All in all, in popular games: