Radeon RX 7600M XT vs R9 M380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
7.19

RX 7600M XT outperforms R9 M380 by a whopping 375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking539151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.72
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameStratoNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed900 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00316.0
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.2
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.19
RX 7600M XT 34.17
+375%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2773
RX 7600M XT 13184
+375%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−400%
120
+400%
1440p12−14
−433%
64
+433%
4K7−8
−400%
35
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−364%
50−55
+364%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−628%
131
+628%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1444%
139
+1444%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−367%
95−100
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−313%
60−65
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−364%
50−55
+364%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−285%
75−80
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−251%
160−170
+251%
Hitman 3 14−16
−350%
60−65
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−219%
130−140
+219%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−620%
144
+620%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−280%
75−80
+280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−338%
100−110
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−111%
110−120
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−1217%
237
+1217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1167%
114
+1167%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−367%
95−100
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−313%
60−65
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−364%
50−55
+364%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−285%
75−80
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−251%
160−170
+251%
Hitman 3 14−16
−350%
60−65
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−219%
130−140
+219%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−610%
142
+610%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−280%
75−80
+280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−767%
208
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−191%
60−65
+191%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−111%
110−120
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−372%
85
+372%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−922%
92
+922%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−313%
60−65
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−364%
50−55
+364%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−283%
180
+283%
Hitman 3 14−16
−350%
60−65
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−233%
140
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−650%
180
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−355%
100
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−11.1%
60
+11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−280%
75−80
+280%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−307%
55−60
+307%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−786%
62
+786%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3250%
67
+3250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−569%
170−180
+569%
Hitman 3 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−607%
106
+607%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1050%
92
+1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2300%
120
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1133%
74
+1133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−252%
160−170
+252%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−325%
50−55
+325%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Hitman 3 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−557%
150−160
+557%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2375%
99
+2375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1200%
52
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−700%
32
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1025%
90
+1025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−3100%
64
+3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1000%
22
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%

This is how R9 M380 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 433% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 3250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600M XT surpassed R9 M380 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.19 34.17
Recency 5 May 2015 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

RX 7600M XT has a 375.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.