Quadro K620 vs Radeon R9 M380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 with Quadro K620, including specs and performance data.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
6.58
+24.4%

R9 M380 outperforms K620 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking606658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.10
Power efficiencyno data9.03
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameStratoGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed900 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data41 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0026.98
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPS0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4824
L1 Cache192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sUp to 29 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
Mantle+-
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M380 6.58
+24.4%
Quadro K620 5.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2752
+24.4%
Samples: 43
Quadro K620 2213
Samples: 2577

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Fortnite 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Valorant 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+28.2%
85−90
−28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Dota 2 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Fortnite 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Valorant 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Dota 2 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Valorant 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Valorant 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.58 5.29
Recency 5 May 2015 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R9 M380 has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon R9 M380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K620 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 755 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M380 or Quadro K620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.