GeForce 9800 GT vs Radeon R9 M380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 with GeForce 9800 GT, including specs and performance data.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
6.20
+479%

R9 M380 outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5591057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiencyno data0.68
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameStratoG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768112
Core clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate48.0033.60
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data1-slot
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M380 6.20
+479%
9800 GT 1.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2771
+480%
9800 GT 478

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Fortnite 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Valorant 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+506%
18−20
−506%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Dota 2 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Fortnite 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Valorant 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Dota 2 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Valorant 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Valorant 75−80
+533%
12−14
−533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.20 1.07
Recency 5 May 2015 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R9 M380 has a 479.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1485 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M380 or GeForce 9800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.