Radeon RX 6650M XT vs R9 M375

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M375
2015
4 GB DDR3
2.53

RX 6650M XT outperforms R9 M375 by a whopping 1655% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.47
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTropoNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1015 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate40.60309.2
Floating-point processing power1.299 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M375 2.53
RX 6650M XT 44.40
+1655%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M375 973
RX 6650M XT 17070
+1654%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−1491%
350−400
+1491%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−860%
95−100
+860%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
Elden Ring 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−860%
95−100
+860%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1750%
220−230
+1750%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−860%
95−100
+860%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
Dota 2 11
−1109%
130−140
+1109%
Elden Ring 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−587%
100−110
+587%
Fortnite 12−14
−1338%
180−190
+1338%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1750%
220−230
+1750%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−2117%
130−140
+2117%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
−533%
200−210
+533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1373%
160−170
+1373%
World of Tanks 45−50
−507%
270−280
+507%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−860%
95−100
+860%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
Dota 2 30
−343%
130−140
+343%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−587%
100−110
+587%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1750%
220−230
+1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−771%
200−210
+771%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 80−85
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−872%
170−180
+872%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
World of Tanks 16−18
−1553%
280−290
+1553%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1943%
140−150
+1943%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Valorant 9−10
−1533%
140−150
+1533%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−469%
90−95
+469%
Elden Ring 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
90−95
+507%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2000%
140−150
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−507%
90−95
+507%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 16−18
−469%
90−95
+469%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3350%
65−70
+3350%
Fortnite 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Valorant 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R9 M375 and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 1491% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 6500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.53 44.40
Recency 5 May 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6650M XT has a 1654.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M375 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R9 M375
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 63 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.