Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M365X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M365X with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.85

T1000 Mobile outperforms R9 M365X by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking709326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.43
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTropoTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate37.0069.84
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPS2.235 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M365X 3.85
T1000 Mobile 17.02
+342%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M365X 1481
T1000 Mobile 6540
+342%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−350%
63
+350%
4K10−12
−380%
48
+380%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−500%
48
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−415%
67
+415%
Valorant 8−9
−875%
78
+875%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Dota 2 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−245%
69
+245%
Fortnite 21−24
−323%
90−95
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−467%
68
+467%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−350%
36
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−294%
134
+294%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−92.3%
25
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−300%
50−55
+300%
Valorant 8−9
−450%
44
+450%
World of Tanks 65−70
−220%
210−220
+220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Dota 2 12−14
−792%
107
+792%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−285%
77
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−250%
110−120
+250%
Valorant 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−485%
150−160
+485%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
World of Tanks 27−30
−337%
110−120
+337%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Metro Exodus 0−1 35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Valorant 10−12
−291%
40−45
+291%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−364%
50−55
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 16−18
−200%
48
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Fortnite 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Valorant 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how R9 M365X and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 350% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 380% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 1150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.85 17.02
Recency 5 May 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T1000 Mobile has a 342.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M365X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M365X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Radeon R9 M365X
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 155 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.