Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 M365X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R7 M380 R7 M465X R9 M360 R9 M365X R9 M370X Mac Edition R9 M375 R9 M375X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M365X and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.54

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms R9 M365X by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M365X R9 M365X
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking776499
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameTropoMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed925 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate37.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−178%
25
+178%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Fortnite 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−194%
50
+194%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 50−55
−82.4%
90−95
+82.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
13
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−162%
170−180
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Dota 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−140%
24
+140%
Fortnite 20−22
−190%
55−60
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−129%
39
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−50%
15
+50%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Valorant 50−55
−82.4%
90−95
+82.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Dota 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Valorant 50−55
−82.4%
90−95
+82.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−174%
70−75
+174%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Valorant 35−40
−164%
95−100
+164%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Valorant 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

Full HD
High

Resident Evil 4 Remake 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how R9 M365X and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 178% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M365X is 18% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M365X performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 35 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.54 9.57
Recency 5 May 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 170% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M365X in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
Maxwell GPU Surface Book Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
GeForce MX110 GeForce MX110
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
GeForce 930A GeForce 930A
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
GT 820M GT 820M
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5670 Mac Edition Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
RX 6600 RX 6600
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
RX 9060 XT RX 9060 XT
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
HD 7430M HD 7430M
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
HD 6490 HD 6490
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
GTX 460 X2 GTX 460 X2
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
HD 6490M Mac Edition HD 6490M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 38 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M365X or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.