Radeon Pro 570X vs R9 M295X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	358	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 3 (2014−2016)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Tonga	Polaris 20
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	16 October 2014 (9 years ago)	18 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	no data	$2299

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1792
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1105 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	123.8
Floating-point performance	2,961 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon Pro 570X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	Not Listed	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	Not Listed	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	6800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	217.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	Not Listed	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	16 October 2014	18 March 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---