GMA 3150 vs Radeon R9 M295X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	442	1598
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.79	no data
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code name	Amethyst	Pineview
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 November 2014 (11 years ago)	9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	16
Core clock speed	723 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	123 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	13 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	0.8
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	1
TMUs	128	2
L1 Cache	512 KB	no data
L2 Cache	512 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCI
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	Not Listed	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	Not Listed	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	Not Listed	9.0c
Shader Model	6.3	3.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.0
OpenCL	Not Listed	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48	no data
4K	26	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	23 November 2014	9 May 2007
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	13 Watt