GMA 3150 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4411598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameAmethystPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate108.80.8
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs1282
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1362 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

R9 M295X Mac Edition has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1823% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 180 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.