RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M290X

Place in the ranking	508	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.87	22.11
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Neptune	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 January 2014 (11 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	5888
Compute units	20	no data
Core clock speed	850 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.00	276.0
Floating-point processing power	2.304 TFLOPS	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	80	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M290X 8.19

RTX A4500 Mobile 43.21
+428%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M290X 3282

RTX A4500 Mobile 17315
+428%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−422%

240−250
+422%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −296%	110−120 +296%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −565%	220−230 +565%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −443%	110−120 +443%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −352%	100−110 +352%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −274%	85−90 +274%
Valorant	30−35 −472%	180−190 +472%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −296%	110−120 +296%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Dota 2	30−33 −347%	130−140 +347%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −189%	100−110 +189%
Fortnite	50−55 −278%	180−190 +278%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −565%	220−230 +565%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −443%	110−120 +443%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −347%	130−140 +347%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −352%	100−110 +352%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −213%	210−220 +213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −274%	85−90 +274%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −369%	160−170 +369%
Valorant	30−35 −472%	180−190 +472%
World of Tanks	120−130 −120%	270−280 +120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −296%	110−120 +296%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −476%	95−100 +476%
Dota 2	30−33 −347%	130−140 +347%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −189%	100−110 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −565%	220−230 +565%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −443%	110−120 +443%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −213%	210−220 +213%
Valorant	30−35 −472%	180−190 +472%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 −750%	85−90 +750%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −673%	85−90 +673%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −327%	170−180 +327%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −571%	45−50 +571%
World of Tanks	60−65 −361%	280−290 +361%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −394%	75−80 +394%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −600%	45−50 +600%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −700%	140−150 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −650%	130−140 +650%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −485%	75−80 +485%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −533%	95−100 +533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −592%	80−85 +592%
Valorant	21−24 −619%	150−160 +619%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Dota 2	18−20 −389%	90−95 +389%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −389%	90−95 +389%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −500%	150−160 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −389%	90−95 +389%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −671%	50−55 +671%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
Dota 2	18−20 −389%	90−95 +389%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Fortnite	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −670%	75−80 +670%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −633%	40−45 +633%
Valorant	8−9 −913%	80−85 +913%

This is how R9 M290X and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4500 Mobile is 422% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 1167% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX A4500 Mobile surpassed R9 M290X in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.19	43.21
Recency	9 January 2014	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	140 Watt

R9 M290X has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 427.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.