GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 M290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X with GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.66
+17.3%

R9 M290X outperforms 570 Rev. 2 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking566610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.92
Power efficiency5.912.30
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNeptuneGF110
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2014 (11 years ago)7 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280480
Compute units20no data
Core clock speed850 MHz732 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0043.92
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs8060
L1 Cache320 KB960 KB
L2 Cache512 KB640 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1280 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz950 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s152.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Fortnite 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+23%
100−105
−23%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Fortnite 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Valorant 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Valorant 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Valorant 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how R9 M290X and GTX 570 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X is 31% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.66 6.53
Recency 9 January 2014 7 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 219 Watt

R9 M290X has a 17.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 119% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M290X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X or GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.