Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M265X M270 M270X M275 M275X M280X M290X M290X Crossfire M290X Mac Edition M295X M295X Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
16.37

6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms R9 M290X Crossfire by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M290X Crossfire R9 M290X Crossfire
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data86.85
Power efficiency6.5919.95
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNeptune CFNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602304
Core clock speed850 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data352.8
Floating-point processing powerno data11.29 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−142%
150−160
+142%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.06

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−105
−150%
250−260
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 100−105
−150%
250−260
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−141%
140−150
+141%
Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−155%
140−150
+155%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Valorant 130−140
−155%
350−400
+155%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 100−105
−150%
250−260
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−150%
550−600
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Dota 2 100−110
−150%
260−270
+150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−141%
140−150
+141%
Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−155%
140−150
+155%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Valorant 130−140
−155%
350−400
+155%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Dota 2 100−110
−150%
260−270
+150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−141%
140−150
+141%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−150%
180−190
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Valorant 130−140
−155%
350−400
+155%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
−153%
240−250
+153%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−141%
400−450
+141%
Valorant 170−180
−135%
400−450
+135%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Valorant 95−100
−153%
250−260
+153%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 60−65
−142%
150−160
+142%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%

This is how R9 M290X Crossfire and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 142% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.37 42.13
Recency 1 March 2014 17 October 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 170 Watt

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a 157.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M290X Crossfire Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
vs
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
vs
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
R9 M290X Crossfire Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
vs
GTX 780M SLI GeForce GTX 780M SLI
CMP 40HX NVIDIA CMP 40HX
vs
GTX 980 Mobile GTX 980 Mobile
6100 + nForce 420 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 420
vs
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
HD Graphics 5500 Intel HD Graphics 5500
vs
GTX 970M SLI GTX 970M SLI
K4000M NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile
R9 M395 AMD Radeon R9 M395
vs
GTX 980M GTX 980M
GT 730M NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
vs
GTX 980M GTX 980M
GTS 250 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
vs
GTX 980M GTX 980M
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB NVIDIA GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
vs
GTX 980M 980M
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
GTX 980M GTX 980M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 87 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.