Quadro NVS 130M vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)no data
GPU code nameNeptune CFG86M
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2014 (10 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
Floating-point performanceno data0.0128 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 10 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 130M, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Quadro NVS 130M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.