A100 PCIe vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking335not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.58no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNeptune CFGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)22 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25606912
Core clock speed850 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 22 June 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has 25% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and A100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while A100 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 54 votes

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or A100 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.