Radeon HD 7640G vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and Radeon HD 7640G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms HD 7640G by a whopping 3587% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 112 | 1107 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.37 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | Devastator Lite |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1443 MHz | 496 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 685 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 1,303 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 10.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.3507 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | IGP |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 138
+1280%
| 10
−1280%
|
| 4K | 78
+3800%
| 2−3
−3800%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+3600%
|
6−7
−3600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+3600%
|
6−7
−3600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+6350%
|
2−3
−6350%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8600%
|
2−3
−8600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+2129%
|
7−8
−2129%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+4133%
|
3−4
−4133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+1656%
|
9−10
−1656%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+628%
|
30−35
−628%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+3600%
|
6−7
−3600%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+969%
|
24−27
−969%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+873%
|
14−16
−873%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+6350%
|
2−3
−6350%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8600%
|
2−3
−8600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+2129%
|
7−8
−2129%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+4133%
|
3−4
−4133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+4300%
|
3−4
−4300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100
+4800%
|
2−3
−4800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 102
+1033%
|
9−10
−1033%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 168
+2700%
|
6−7
−2700%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+628%
|
30−35
−628%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+873%
|
14−16
−873%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+6350%
|
2−3
−6350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+2129%
|
7−8
−2129%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 93
+933%
|
9−10
−933%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 85−90
+4200%
|
2−3
−4200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 100
+1567%
|
6−7
−1567%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+628%
|
30−35
−628%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8600%
|
2−3
−8600%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+4617%
|
6−7
−4617%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+4050%
|
2−3
−4050%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+5900%
|
1−2
−5900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1491%
|
10−12
−1491%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+13100%
|
2−3
−13100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+5050%
|
2−3
−5050%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+3800%
|
3−4
−3800%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 60−65
+6200%
|
1−2
−6200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 100−110
+5300%
|
2−3
−5300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 85−90
+493%
|
14−16
−493%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 72
+7100%
|
1−2
−7100%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+4017%
|
6−7
−4017%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+6400%
|
1−2
−6400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+3800%
|
2−3
−3800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 37
+1750%
|
2−3
−1750%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 35−40
+3700%
|
1−2
−3700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and HD 7640G compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 1280% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 3800% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 13100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 1070 SLI Mobile surpassed HD 7640G in all 35 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.19 | 1.09 |
| Recency | 16 August 2016 | 15 May 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 32 nm |
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 3587.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
