Matrox Parhelia 128 MB vs Radeon R9 M280X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameSaturnParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 February 2015 (9 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate61.600.8
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR
Maximum RAM amount0 MB128 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 118.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.41.5
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 February 2015 25 June 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 M280X has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M280X and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M280X is a notebook card while Matrox Parhelia 128 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Radeon R9 M280X
Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Parhelia 128 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 128 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.