ATI 3D Rage vs Radeon R9 M275

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking785not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameVenusMach64 GT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 1996 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed900 MHz44 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million5 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Texture fill rate37.000.04
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs401

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz57 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s456.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2014 1 April 1996
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm

R9 M275 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M275 and 3D Rage. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M275 is a notebook card while 3D Rage is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R9 M275
ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.