NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R9 FURY X
25.84

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 FURY X by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking191190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.386.16
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameFijiN19E-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (8 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$350 (0.5x MSRP)$2393
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 FURY X has 20% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961920
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data945 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8198.7
Floating-point performance8,602 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 FURY X and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data
VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 FURY X 25.84
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10
+1%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 FURY X by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 FURY X 10015
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+1%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 FURY X by 1% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 FURY X 16710
+12.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842

Radeon R9 FURY X outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 13% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−5.6%
95
+5.6%
4K85−90
−3.5%
88
+3.5%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 25.84 26.10
Recency 24 June 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 80 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 FURY X and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 77 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 219 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.