UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) vs Radeon R9 390X2
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | 512 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 5400 Bit | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | GDDR5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390X2 and UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 390X2 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
