GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 and GeForce 8800 GTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
19.87
+1440%

R9 390 outperforms 8800 GTX by a whopping 1440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking253988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.150.02
Power efficiency5.750.66
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGrenadaG80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R9 390 has 50650% better value for money than 8800 GTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560575
Core clock speedno data576 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt155 Watt
Texture fill rate160.036.86
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs16032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length275 mm270 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB768 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s86.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390 19.87
+1440%
8800 GTX 1.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390 8884
+1434%
8800 GTX 579

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.87 1.29
Recency 18 June 2015 8 November 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 155 Watt

R9 390 has a 1440.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GTX, on the other hand, has 77.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 593 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 or GeForce 8800 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.