Tesla M1060 vs Radeon R5 330 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameHainanGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320240
Core clock speed830 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate17.1048.80
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 188 Watt

R5 330 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 276% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 330 OEM and Tesla M1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 330 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M1060 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Radeon R5 330 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 330 OEM or Tesla M1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.