Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K2200M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X with Quadro K3000M, including specs and performance data.

R9 380X
2015, $229
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.66
+279%

R9 380X outperforms K3000M by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 380X R9 380X
K3000M K3000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking394750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.040.72
Power efficiency5.933.96
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameAntiguaGK104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)1 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

R9 380X has 878% better value for money than K3000M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048576
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data654 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate124.231.39
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS0.7534 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12848
L1 Cache512 KB48 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s89.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan++
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380X 14.66
+279%
K3000M 3.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380X 6132
+279%
Samples: 1183
K3000M 1619
Samples: 372

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p120−130
+264%
33
−264%
Full HD140−150
+278%
37
−278%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.64
+156%
4.19
−156%
  • R9 380X has 156% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how R9 380X and K3000M compete in popular games:

  • R9 380X is 264% faster in 900p
  • R9 380X is 278% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.66 3.87
Recency 19 November 2015 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 75 Watt

R9 380X has a 278.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

K3000M, on the other hand, has 153.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K3000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Quadro K3000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
K3000M Quadro K3000M
vs
W5130M FirePro W5130M
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
vs
ATI HD 2400 XT HD 2400 XT
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
vs
ATI HD 2350 PRO HD 2350 PRO
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
vs
GT 120 Mac Edition GT 120 Mac Edition
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
vs
GeForce 9800S GeForce 9800S
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
vs
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
HD Graphics 4200 Graphics 4200
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
HD 6570M HD 6570M
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
ATI X1300 LE Radeon X1300 LE
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
GeForce 9800S GeForce 9800S
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
RX Vega 11 Embedded RX Vega 11 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 218 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 70 votes

Rate Quadro K3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Quadro K3000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.