GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 380
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
15.90
+13.2%

Radeon R9 380 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking315348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.083.36
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTonga ProGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 June 2015 (8 years ago)27 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$12.90 (0.1x MSRP)$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 380 has 170% better value for money than GTX 760 Ti OEM.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921344
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data915 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate108.6109.8
Floating-point performance3,476 gflops2,634 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length221 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin2x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 380 15.90
+13.2%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 14.04

Radeon R9 380 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 380 6147
+13.3%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 5427

Radeon R9 380 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD66
+20%
55−60
−20%
4K24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Hitman 3 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

This is how R9 380 and GTX 760 Ti OEM compete in popular games:

  • R9 380 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • R9 380 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.90 14.04
Recency 26 June 2015 27 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 170 Watt

The Radeon R9 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 760 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 69 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.