GMA vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon R9 360 OEM Radeon R9 370 Radeon R9 370 1024SP Radeon R9 370X Radeon R9 380 Radeon R9 380 OEM Radeon R9 380X Radeon R9 390 Radeon R9 390 X2 Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA 950 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA X3100

Contents

R9 380 R9 380
GMA GMA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3451540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.77no data
Power efficiency5.75no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameAntiguaCloverview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate108.61.066
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs1122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed970 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.5ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380 6103
+305050%
GMA 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65no data
4K27no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
4K7.37no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Fortnite 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data
World of Tanks 200−210 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
World of Tanks 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Fortnite 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
Valorant 18−20 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 18 June 2015 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R9 380 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 380 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380 is a desktop card while GMA is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
Intel GMA
GMA
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
GMA GMA
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
R6 Graphics Radeon R6 Graphics
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
P104-100 P104 100
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Vega 3 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
R9 285X Radeon R9 285X
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Radeon 550X Radeon 550X
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Arc A780 Arc A780
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GTX 960 960
vs
GTX 675M 675M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 824 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.