GeForce GTX 775M vs Radeon R9 290X

Place in the ranking	297	476
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.74	no data
Power efficiency	4.58	6.50
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Hawaii	N13E-GTX-A2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	24 October 2013 (11 years ago)	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	1344
Core clock speed	no data	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	947 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,200 million	3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	176.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.632 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	176	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	275 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	no data
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Optimus	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 18.53
+104%

GTX 775M 9.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290X 7425
+104%

GTX 775M 3634

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 290X 16168
+166%

GTX 775M 6071

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	85 +113%	40−45 −113%
4K	52 +117%	24−27 −117%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.46	no data
4K	10.56	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +105%	18−20 −105%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +96.8%	30−35 −96.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +105%	18−20 −105%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +113%	35−40 −113%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +113%	24−27 −113%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +100%	24−27 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +80%	24−27 −80%
Valorant	75−80 +117%	35−40 −117%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +96.8%	30−35 −96.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +105%	18−20 −105%
Dota 2	45 +32.4%	30−35 −32.4%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Fortnite	100−110 +87.3%	55−60 −87.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +113%	35−40 −113%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +113%	24−27 −113%
Grand Theft Auto V	67 +97.1%	30−35 −97.1%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +100%	24−27 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +77%	70−75 −77%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +80%	24−27 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +107%	27−30 −107%
Valorant	75−80 +117%	35−40 −117%
World of Tanks	280 +103%	130−140 −103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +96.8%	30−35 −96.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +105%	18−20 −105%
Dota 2	136 +300%	30−35 −300%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +113%	35−40 −113%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +113%	24−27 −113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +77%	70−75 −77%
Valorant	75−80 +117%	35−40 −117%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +158%	12−14 −158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +289%	40−45 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
World of Tanks	130−140 +94.1%	65−70 −94.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +155%	20−22 −155%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +159%	16−18 −159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +108%	12−14 −108%
Valorant	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Dota 2	52 +160%	20−22 −160%
Grand Theft Auto V	52 +160%	20−22 −160%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +115%	27−30 −115%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 +160%	20−22 −160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Dota 2	84 +320%	20−22 −320%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Fortnite	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Valorant	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%