GeForce GTX 775M vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290X with GeForce GTX 775M, including specs and performance data.

R9 290X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.23
+106%

R9 290X outperforms GTX 775M by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking272441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.111.73
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHawaii XTN13E-GTX-A2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (10 years ago)24 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data
Current price$20 (0x MSRP)$780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 290X has 484% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161344
Core clock speedno data719 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0no data
Floating-point performance5,632 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 290X and GeForce GTX 775M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 19.23
+106%
GTX 775M 9.32

Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 775M by 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 290X 7425
+106%
GTX 775M 3600

Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 775M by 106% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 290X 16168
+166%
GTX 775M 6071

Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 775M by 166% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+128%
40−45
−128%
4K54
+125%
24−27
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

This is how R9 290X and GTX 775M compete in popular games:

  • R9 290X is 128% faster in 1080p
  • R9 290X is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.23 9.32
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon R9 290X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 435 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.