GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs Radeon R9 290X

Place in the ranking	286	384
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.82	no data
Power efficiency	4.59	12.21
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Hawaii	GP107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	24 October 2013 (11 years ago)	21 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	768
Core clock speed	no data	1392 MHz
Boost clock speed	947 MHz	1518 MHz
Number of transistors	6,200 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	176.0	72.86
Floating-point processing power	5.632 TFLOPS	2.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	24
TMUs	176	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	275 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	84.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	+
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 19.25
+45.5%

GTX 1050 3 GB 13.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290X 7425
+45.4%

GTX 1050 3 GB 5105

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	86 +56.4%	55−60 −56.4%
4K	49 +63.3%	30−35 −63.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.38	no data
4K	11.20	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+66.7%

18−20

−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +59.3%	27−30 −59.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
Hitman 3	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +50%	60−65 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +59.3%	27−30 −59.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
Hitman 3	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	137 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +50%	60−65 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +59.3%	27−30 −59.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
Hitman 3	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +50%	60−65 −50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+48.6%

35−40

−48.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +51.4%	70−75 −51.4%
Hitman 3	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +52%	75−80 −52%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+52.4%

21−24

−52.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Hitman 3	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+70%

10−11

−70%

This is how R9 290X and GTX 1050 3 GB compete in popular games:

R9 290X is 56% faster in 1080p
R9 290X is 63% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.25	13.23
Recency	24 October 2013	21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt