Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290X with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

R9 290X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
18.88
+62.6%

R9 290X outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.82no data
Power efficiency4.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28167
Boost clock speed947 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate176.0no data
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs176no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_2
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 18.88
+62.6%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290X 7425
+62.5%
Arc Graphics 130V 4568

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 290X 16168
+69.8%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 290X 11717
+41.9%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+166%
32
−166%
4K52
+73.3%
30−35
−73.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.46no data
4K10.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−20.6%
41
+20.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+9.7%
31
−9.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+14.1%
71
−14.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Valorant 75−80
+66%
45−50
−66%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+21.4%
28
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Dota 2 45
+9.8%
41
−9.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+132%
28
−132%
Fortnite 100−110
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+39.7%
58
−39.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+55.8%
40−45
−55.8%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+47.2%
85−90
−47.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Valorant 75−80
+66%
45−50
−66%
World of Tanks 280
+70.7%
160−170
−70.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+36%
25
−36%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Dota 2 136
+70%
80−85
−70%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+68.8%
48
−68.8%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+47.2%
85−90
−47.2%
Valorant 75−80
+66%
45−50
−66%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Dota 2 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+70%
100−105
−70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
World of Tanks 130−140
+57.1%
80−85
−57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Valorant 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 52
+136%
21−24
−136%
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+136%
21−24
−136%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+136%
21−24
−136%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 84
+68%
50−55
−68%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Fortnite 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

This is how R9 290X and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • R9 290X is 166% faster in 1080p
  • R9 290X is 73% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 290X is 136% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 290X is ahead in 54 tests (98%)
  • Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.88 11.61
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

R9 290X has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 290X is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 456 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.