Radeon RX Vega 11 vs R9 290

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 290
2013
4 GB GDDR5
20.91
+282%

R9 290 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 282% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking246573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.450.76
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameHawaiiVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 November 2013 (10 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$20 (0.1x MSRP)$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 290 has 1538% better value for money than RX Vega 11.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560704
Core clock speed947 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1240 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate151.561.60
Floating-point performance4,849 gflops1,760 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290 20.91
+282%
RX Vega 11 5.48

R9 290 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 282% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 290 8093
+282%
RX Vega 11 2120

R9 290 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 282% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 290 11860
+239%
RX Vega 11 3494

R9 290 outperforms RX Vega 11 by 239% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+257%
28
−257%
1440p21−24
+250%
6
−250%
4K45−50
+275%
12
−275%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.91 5.48
Recency 5 November 2013 26 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon R9 290 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 479 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1682 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.