Tesla M40 vs Radeon R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 280X
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
15.11

Tesla M40 outperforms Radeon R9 280X by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking330186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.9384.59
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameThaiti XTLGM200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)10 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$11.99 (0x MSRP)$101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M40 has 609% better value for money than R9 280X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speedno data948 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1112 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0213.5
Floating-point performance4,096 gflops6,844 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 280X 15.11
Tesla M40 26.87
+77.8%

Tesla M40 outperforms Radeon R9 280X by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 280X 5837
Tesla M40 10376
+77.8%

Tesla M40 outperforms Radeon R9 280X by 78% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
4K35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−69%
120−130
+69%
Hitman 3 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−69%
120−130
+69%
Hitman 3 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−69%
120−130
+69%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−75%
35−40
+75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

This is how R9 280X and Tesla M40 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 67% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla M40 is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.11 26.87
Recency 8 October 2013 10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 12 GB

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 280X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA Tesla M40
Tesla M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 636 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 76 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.