Quadro K2200 vs Radeon R9 280X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 280X
2013
3072 MB GDDR5
15.08
+64.4%

Radeon R9 280X outperforms Quadro K2200 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking327441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation11.932.89
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameThaiti XTLGM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $395.75
Current price$11.99 (0x MSRP)$313 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 280X has 313% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speedno data1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate128.044.96
Floating-point performance4,096 gflops1,439 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mm202 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 280X 15.08
+64.4%
Quadro K2200 9.17

Radeon R9 280X outperforms Quadro K2200 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 280X 5837
+64.4%
Quadro K2200 3551

Radeon R9 280X outperforms Quadro K2200 by 64% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
4K31
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how R9 280X and Quadro K2200 compete in popular games:

  • R9 280X is 85.7% faster than Quadro K2200 in 1080p
  • R9 280X is 72.2% faster than Quadro K2200 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 15.08 9.17
Recency 8 October 2013 22 July 2014
Cost $299 $395.75
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 68 Watt

The Radeon R9 280X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop card while Quadro K2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 616 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 340 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.