GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon R9 270X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 270X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
12.64
+903%

Radeon R9 270X outperforms GeForce 9600 GT by a whopping 903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking367999
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.550.03
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCuracao XTG94
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $179
Current price$136 (0.7x MSRP)$141 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 270X has 15067% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128064
CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt96 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate84.0020.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance2,688 gflops208 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.016x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data9" (22.9 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
DisplayPort support+no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.64
+903%
9600 GT 1.26

Radeon R9 270X outperforms GeForce 9600 GT by 903% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270X 4888
+904%
9600 GT 487

Radeon R9 270X outperforms GeForce 9600 GT by 904% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Hitman 3 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Hitman 3 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Hitman 3 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Hitman 3 9−10 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.64 1.26
Recency 8 October 2013 21 February 2008
Cost $199 $179
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 96 Watt

The Radeon R9 270X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 707 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1902 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.