ATI FirePro RG220 vs Radeon R8 M445DX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking875not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMesoRV711
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed780 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.424.000
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R8 M445DX has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M445DX and FirePro RG220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M445DX is a desktop card while FirePro RG220 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon R8 M445DX
ATI FirePro RG220
FirePro RG220

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.