NVS 810 vs Radeon R8 M365DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R8 M365DX with NVS 810, including specs and performance data.

R8 M365DX
2015
1.46

810 outperforms R8 M365DX by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking996820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.19
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameMesoGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)4 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512 ×2
Core clock speed900 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data68 Watt
Texture fill rate27.0033.06 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs816 ×2
TMUs2432 ×2
L1 Cache96 KB256 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R8 M365DX 1.46
NVS 810 2.69
+84.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R8 M365DX 647
Samples: 6
NVS 810 1191
+84.1%
Samples: 29

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Fortnite 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Valorant 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Fortnite 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Valorant 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Valorant 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how R8 M365DX and NVS 810 compete in popular games:

  • NVS 810 is 71% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 2.69
Recency 3 June 2015 4 November 2015

NVS 810 has a 84.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M365DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M365DX is a notebook graphics card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M365DX or NVS 810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.