Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameSpectre LiteN19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 February 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$462 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed554 MHz930 / 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1500 / 1620 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate13.30103.7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics and Quadro T2000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 February 2014 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics and Quadro T2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.