Arc A770 vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A780 Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
50.95
+50.5%

GV100 outperforms Arc A770 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0055.90
Power efficiency14.1510.44
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGV100DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 1763% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1132 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6614.4
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs128128
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.0-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GV100 50.95
+50.5%
Arc A770 33.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19824
+50.5%
Arc A770 13171

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+44.1%
111
−44.1%
1440p90−95
+45.2%
62
−45.2%
4K60−65
+50%
40
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p56.24
−1798%
2.96
+1798%
1440p99.99
−1784%
5.31
+1784%
4K149.98
−1724%
8.23
+1724%
  • Arc A770 has 1798% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 1784% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 1724% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 45% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 50.95 33.85
Recency 27 March 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 50.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
RX Vega M GH AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU Z1 Extreme GPU
GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB 3080 12 GB
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1650 Ti Mobile
RX Vega Mobile AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
RX 560 896SP AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
RX 6600M RX 6600M
GRID M60-1Q NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5382 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.