Radeon R7 M365X vs R7 M465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M370 M380 M440 M445 M460 M465 M465X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M465 and Radeon R7 M365X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M465
2016
2 GB DDR3
2.50
+28.2%

R7 M465 outperforms R7 M365X by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M465 R7 M465
R7 M365X R7 M365X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867932
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTopazLitho
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speed1100 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate27.0023.04
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2424
L1 Cache96 KB96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M465 2.50
+28.2%
R7 M365X 1.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M465 1058
+28.4%
Samples: 29
R7 M365X 824
Samples: 36

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Valorant 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Valorant 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.50 1.95
Recency 15 May 2016 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB

R7 M465 has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

R7 M365X, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon R7 M465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M465 Radeon R7 M465
vs
HD 8750M Radeon HD 8750M
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
GeForce 920A GeForce 920A
R7 M465 Radeon R7 M465
vs
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
R5 M420 AMD Radeon R5 M420
vs
ATI FireGL Z1-128 Z1 128
R5 M420 AMD Radeon R5 M420
vs
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p FireGL 9700 X1-256p
R5 M420 AMD Radeon R5 M420
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
R7 M465 AMD Radeon R7 M465
vs
HD 8400 HD 8400
R7 M465 AMD Radeon R7 M465
vs
R7 M465X R7 M465X
R7 M465 AMD Radeon R7 M465
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
R7 M465X AMD Radeon R7 M465X
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Radeon E6465 AMD Radeon E6465
vs
H200 SXM 141 GB SXM 141 GB
R7 M350 AMD Radeon R7 M350
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
R7 M350 AMD Radeon R7 M350
vs
GT 520 PCI GT 520 PCI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M465 or Radeon R7 M365X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.