UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Radeon R5 M420

Radeon R5 A230 Radeon R5 M230 Radeon R5 M240 Radeon R5 M320 Radeon R5 M420 Radeon R5 M435 Radeon R6 M255DX Radeon R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M435DX Radeon R7 M260DX Radeon R8 M350DX Radeon R8 M435DX
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M420 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R5 M420
2016
4 GB DDR3
1.25

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) outperforms R5 M420 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R5 M420 R5 M420
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10471019
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.55
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameJetGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32024
Core clock speed780 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate17.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.544 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+55.6%
18
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 3
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+45.5%
11
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how R5 M420 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 14% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M420 is 56% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R5 M420 is ahead in 3 tests (6%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is ahead in 11 tests (23%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (71%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.25 1.36
Recency 15 May 2016 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 8.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R5 M420 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU).

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 M420
Radeon R5 M420
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
GT 435M GeForce GT 435M
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
vs
Playstation 3 RSX Playstation 3 RSX
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
GT 630 GeForce GT 630
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
GeForce 810M GeForce 810M
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
vs
R5 A330 Radeon R5 A330
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
R7 M465 Radeon R7 M465
vs
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
R7 M465 Radeon R7 M465
vs
GT 540M GeForce GT 540M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 107 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M420 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.