Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs R7 M465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M465 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

R7 M465
2016
2 GB DDR3
2.73

AI PRO R9700 outperforms R7 M465 by a whopping 2496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.99
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTopazNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed1100 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00747.5
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M465 2.73
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+2496%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M465 1145
AI PRO R9700 29693
+2493%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Fortnite 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Valorant 45−50
−2456%
1150−1200
+2456%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−2447%
1350−1400
+2447%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Dota 2 27−30
−2493%
700−750
+2493%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Fortnite 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Valorant 45−50
−2456%
1150−1200
+2456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Dota 2 27−30
−2493%
700−750
+2493%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Valorant 45−50
−2456%
1150−1200
+2456%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−2400%
500−550
+2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−2300%
600−650
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2300%
600−650
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Valorant 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.73 70.86
Recency 15 May 2016 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

AI PRO R9700 has a 2495.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M465 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M465 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M465 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.