To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
AMD Radeon R7 M465 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
- Core clock speed 825
- Max video memory 2048 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 4000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 945
- Max video memory 6144 MB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000
- Maximum resolution
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
|Place in performance rating||574||20|
|Value for money||no data||16.05|
|GPU code name||Litho XT||N19E-Q1|
|Market segment||Laptop||Mobile workstation|
|Release date||1 January 2017 (4 years ago)||27 May 2019 (2 years ago)|
|Price now||no data||$2393|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
|Pipelines / CUDA cores||384||1920|
|Core clock speed||825 MHz||945 MHz|
|Boost clock speed||960 MHz||1380 MHz|
|Number of transistors||1,550 million||10,800 million|
|Manufacturing process technology||28 nm||12 nm|
|Thermal design power (TDP)||no data||80 Watt|
|Texture fill rate||27.00||198.7|
|Floating-point performance||864.0 gflops||no data|
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R7 M465 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
|Laptop size||medium sized||large|
|Interface||PCIe 3.0 x8||PCIe 3.0 x16|
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
|Maximum RAM amount||2 GB||6 GB|
|Memory bus width||128 Bit||192 Bit|
|Memory clock speed||4000 MHz||14000 MHz|
|Memory bandwidth||14.4 GB/s||448.0 GB/s|
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
|Display Connectors||No outputs||No outputs|
|G-SYNC support||no data||+|
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
|VR Ready||no data||+|
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
|DirectX||12 (12_0)||12 Ultimate (12_1)|
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Advantages and disadvantages
|Novelty||1 January 2017||27 May 2019|
|Memory bus width||128||192|
|Pipelines / CUDA cores||384||1920|
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M465 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon R7 M465 by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon R7 M465's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce 930MX, which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 M465:
Competitors of Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 46% and lower by 96 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.