GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M445 and GeForce MX110, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M445
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 15 Watt
2.12

MX110 outperforms R7 M445 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking850722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.758.44
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameMesoGM108S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)17 November 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320256
Core clock speed780 MHz978 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHz1006 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million1,020 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4016.10
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS0.5151 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.06.7 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M445 2.12
GeForce MX110 3.18
+50%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M445 946
GeForce MX110 1421
+50.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M445 2208
+4.1%
GeForce MX110 2121

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M445 6872
GeForce MX110 9124
+32.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M445 1579
GeForce MX110 1714
+8.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M445 9617
GeForce MX110 11266
+17.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M445 126481
+2%
GeForce MX110 124036

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

R7 M445 471
+4.6%
GeForce MX110 451

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−28.6%
18
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−100%
14
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
Fortnite 10−12
−173%
30
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−45.5%
16
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18
+50%
Valorant 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 24−27
−50%
36
+50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9
+200%
Fortnite 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−117%
13
+117%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+11.1%
9
−11.1%
Valorant 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Valorant 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R7 M445 and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 29% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M445 is 100% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 233% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M445 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • GeForce MX110 is ahead in 50 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 3.18
Recency 15 May 2016 17 November 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

R7 M445 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX110, on the other hand, has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M445 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 120 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2366 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M445 or GeForce MX110, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.