GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M380

Place in performance ranking	634	667
Place by popularity	not in top-100	96
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.91
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Tropo	N16V-GMR1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 May 2015 (9 years ago)	1 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	no data	$1057

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	256
Compute units	10	no data
Core clock speed	915 MHz	965 MHz
Boost clock speed	915 MHz	993 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	36.60	23.83
Floating-point performance	1,171 gflops	762.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M380 and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.1.126
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M380 4.31
+15.5%

GeForce MX110 3.73

Radeon R7 M380 outperforms GeForce MX110 by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M380 1668
+15.5%

GeForce MX110 1444

Radeon R7 M380 outperforms GeForce MX110 by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18−21

+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +50%	10 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Hitman 3	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Hitman 3	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +80%	5 −80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

This is how R7 M380 and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX110 is 0% faster than R7 M380 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M380 is 200% faster than the GeForce MX110.
in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 25% faster than the R7 M380.

All in all, in popular games: