ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 vs Radeon R7 M360

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking979not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameMesoM56
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38417
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Texture fill rate27.005.100
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz475 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s15.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

R7 M360 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M360 and Mobility FireGL V5200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M360 is a notebook graphics card while Mobility FireGL V5200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M360
Radeon R7 M360
ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
Mobility FireGL V5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 196 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.