Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M350 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 M350
2015
4 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
2.57

T500 Mobile outperforms R7 M350 by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M350 R7 M350
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking866555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6535.29
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMesoTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate24.3694.92
Floating-point processing power0.7795 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−260%
36
+260%
1440p4−5
−275%
15
+275%
4K5−6
−240%
17
+240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how R7 M350 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 260% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 275% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 240% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.57 8.25
Recency 5 May 2015 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

R7 M350 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M350 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GTX 760A GeForce GTX 760A
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
R5 M250 R5 M250
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GMA 950 GMA 950
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
HD 7350 OEM PCI HD 7350 OEM PCI
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
RX 5300 RX 5300
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
Arctic Sound 1T Sound 1T
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
Arctic Sound 2T Sound 2T
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
RX 5300 XT OEM RX 5300 XT OEM
R7 M365 Radeon R7 M365
vs
ATI 9100 Radeon 9100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 62 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M350 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.