Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M350 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 M350
2015
4 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
2.57

T1200 Mobile outperforms R7 M350 by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M350 R7 M350
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking866350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6574.22
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMesoTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate24.3691.20
Floating-point processing power0.7795 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−625%
58
+625%
1440p4−5
−725%
33
+725%
4K10−12
−710%
81
+710%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how R7 M350 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 625% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 725% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 710% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.57 17.35
Recency 5 May 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M350 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GTX 760A GeForce GTX 760A
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
GT 230 OEM 230 OEM
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
HD 8310E 8310E
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile 3000 Mobile
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
Atari VCS 800 GPU 800 GPU
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
A10 PCIe PCIe
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
GTX 1630 1630
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile 4060 Mobile
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
Arc 130T Mobile 130T Mobile
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 8 GB
R7 M365 AMD R7 M365
vs
GTX 950M Mac Edition 950M Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 62 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 169 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M350 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.