UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon R7 M340

Radeon R7 M260 Radeon R7 M265 Radeon R7 M270 Radeon R7 M340 Radeon R7 M350 Radeon R7 M360 Radeon R7 M365X Radeon R7 M370 Radeon R7 M380 Radeon R7 M440 Radeon R7 M445 Radeon R7 M460
VS
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M340 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

R7 M340
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.70

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms R7 M340 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R7 M340 R7 M340
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking926655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.73
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameMesoRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320256
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed943 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate20.4220.80
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M340 1.70
UHD Graphics 750 4.49
+164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M340 655
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+165%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−131%
30−35
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 0−1 10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−29.4%
40−45
+29.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 0−1 10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−29.4%
40−45
+29.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−325%
16−18
+325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−29.4%
40−45
+29.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 M340 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 131% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M340 is 24% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M340 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 45 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.70 4.49
Recency 5 May 2015 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 750 has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
RTX A40 RTX A40
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
Cezanne Cezanne
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 313 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 388 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.