ATI Radeon 9500 vs R7 M340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	933	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Rage 8 (2002−2006)
GPU code name	Meso Pro DDR3	R300
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	16 June 2015 (9 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	no data
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	1021 MHz	275 MHz
Boost clock speed	1021 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	950 million	110 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.16	1.100
Floating-point performance	0.5491 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	540 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	17.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	2.0
OpenCL	Not Listed	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	16 June 2015	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---