GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs Radeon R7 M275DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1060 3 GB 1060 3 GB GP104 1060 5 GB 1060 6 GB 1060 6 GB 9Gbps 1060 6 GB GDDR5X 1060 6 GB GP104 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M275DX with GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, including specs and performance data.

R7 M275DX
2014
3.08

1060 5 GB outperforms R7 M275DX by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M275DX R7 M275DX
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking798288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.04
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)26 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961280
Core clock speedno data1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−608%
170−180
+608%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Fortnite 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 47
−538%
300−310
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Dota 2 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Fortnite 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Dota 2 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−579%
190−200
+579%
Valorant 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Valorant 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

This is how R7 M275DX and GTX 1060 5 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 5 GB is 608% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.08 21.93
Recency 4 June 2014 26 December 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

GTX 1060 5 GB has a 612% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M275DX is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
vs
510 OEM 510 OEM
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
vs
Radeon 530X 530X
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
vs
GMA X4500HD X4500HD
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
vs
GT 1010 DDR4 1010 DDR4
R7 M275DX AMD R7 M275DX
vs
GT 630M 630M
R7 M275DX AMD R7 M275DX
vs
Instinct MI250X MI250X
R7 M275DX AMD R7 M275DX
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 112EU Mobile
GT 745M NVIDIA GT 745M
vs
ATI X700 PRO X700 PRO
GT 745M NVIDIA GT 745M
vs
ATI 9250 PCI 9250 PCI
GT 745M NVIDIA GT 745M
vs
405 OEM 405 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 715 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M275DX or GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.